Hardening makes only then sense if it takes long time to fix protocol related stuff, e.g. Open source projects dont always have to and Ungoogled Chromium is not one that needs to be funded. Brave has a company behind it, which has to make money some how.
UNGOOGLED CHROMIUM VS IRIDUM INSTALL
Better install another 100 addons and remove everything and think you are more secure, you definitly not get much benefit from that, except problems on some pages. Ungoogled-Chromium is definitely better on privacy that Brave. But since only less people understand it, it’s like praying in the dessert. It’s false sense to think that removing everything helps in this case if most attacks not even work like that.Īnother example is HTML5 and the auto-download problem, people then using maybe infected addons to stopping this, instead that needs to be fixed within browser/protocol, which also would reduce a lot of attack scenarious. The problem is to remove everything make less sense, since a lot of pages will start using it, it would be ‘smarter’ to fix this in protocols itself so that even if a ‘ Malicious’ page could’t abuse it even if they want it. WebRTC is a protocol which is not more or less secure like evrything other protocol. The other gimmicks like WebRTC are not really for securing anything, it’s more gimmick. In FF this plays less a role since you can sync to your own server but not in Chrome.
Disable JavaScript dialog boxes from showing when a page closes (Sad to see you go, here is an offer you may be interested in.).Ĭhromium or Chrome are secure, such hardening is only to minimize or elliminate the conections to e.g. Clear HTTP authentication cache on demand from the "more tools" menu. Disable Safe-Browsing, WebRTC, Intranet Redirect Detector. Automatic formatting of the omnibar is disabled (no more stripping). Search provider "no search" added to Omnibox to disable searching. Functionality that is specific to Google domains, Google Host Detector, Google URL Tracker, Google Cloud Messaging and Google Hotwording among others, are disabled. Many web domains referenced by the browser are substituted with qjz9zk. If you dig deeper, you find the following core changes that are made during the ungoogled-chromium creation process: Binaries are build from source, or used when the system provides them. Binaries are stripped from the source tree. Features that communicate with Google or weaken privacy are removed or disabled. It behaves in most regards just like Chromium but with the following main differences: Next generation Brave browser for Android, Linux, macOS, Windows.Ungoogled-Chromium is a fork of Chromium that strips many of these bits out of the browser to improve user privacy. A keyboard-driven, vim-like browser based on PyQt5. It will gain more portability / integration over time. It has integration into Android's Bionic libc and can be used externally with musl and glibc as a dynamic library for use on other Linux-based platforms. Hardened allocator designed for modern systems. Also adds semi-automatic extension updating. Allows adding extensions from chrome web store on ungoogled-chromium. uBlock Origin - An efficient blocker for Chromium and Firefox. It delivers a browsing experience visually similar to what you get with Google Chrome, but with more options and more privacy Info: stable-chromium-version ungoogled ungoogled Chromium without Google integration and enhanced privacy, based on the 'Bromite' project of Carl 1200 x 1200 jpeg 69 The Bromite browser has its own package. 🦊 I respect proton UI and aim to improve it. Core engine for the Brave browser for Android, Linux, macOS, Windows. Bromite a Chromium fork with ad blocking and privacy enhancements take back your browser! The official GitHub mirror of the Chromium source 
When comparing ungoogled-chromium-void and ungoogled-chromium you can also consider the following projects:
0 kommentar(er)
